Space Shuttle Columbia: Goodbye to A Good Old Girl

By SpaceRef Editor
February 7, 2003
Filed under
Space Shuttle Columbia: Goodbye to A Good Old Girl

Note: this article first appeared in the Wall Street Journal and is reprinted here with the author’s permission. Image: Memorial in Coalwood, West Virginia [enlarge]

HUNSTSVILLE, Ala.-My wife and I have had a personal relationship with a
national asset called Columbia for more than 20 years. Linda worked as a
graphics artist for Rockwell, the shuttle’s builder, back in the 1970s. I
came on board with NASA in 1981, the first year Columbia flew. She
represented for me the culmination of so many of the hopes and dreams I
wrote about in my memoir “Rocket Boys” and in the movie adaptation,

I was on the training team of many of her crews. I was on the pad with her
at the Cape where the pad rats always said she was a “good old girl,”
reliable and steady. She also carried my National Science Fair medal into
orbit in 1997, and in 1998 carried a small bolt from one of the rockets I
built as a teenager back in Coalwood, W. Va. That was on the same flight
that took John Glenn back into orbit. Oh yes, she was a good old girl and,
my God, I’m going to miss her.

I’m retired from NASA now, a full-time writer, and my books are mostly
small town life and family. After five years away from the agency, I
think I
can look objectively at it. I learned from my coal mine superintendent
father that dreams and hopes don’t hold up mine roofs or dig coal. It’s
necessary to be hard-headed and tough when it comes to running a coal
One of Dad’s management points was “Don’t be afraid to tell a man he’s no
good. A man can’t get good if he don’t know he’s bad.” He also said, “When
things go wrong, don’t hunt for someone else to blame. Fix it and get on
with business.”

Every day, most NASA employees wake up and say to themselves, “Oh boy, I
to work for NASA.” Few do it for the pay which, in any case, isn’t all
wonderful. My dad would have liked them. He would have also liked Sean
O’Keefe, the new NASA Administrator. I know I do. He’s hard-headed and
like my dad. Mr. O’Keefe was baptized by fire on Saturday and he’s going
through a period of mourning right now. But he’s a straight-shooter and a
pragmatist. I believe he’s going to take a clear-eyed look at where we are
as a nation in terms of human spaceflight and make some changes. In fact,
even before this tragedy, he had already asked for an Orbital Space Plane
(OSP), a machine much simpler than the shuttle to carry astronauts to and
from low earth orbit. The OSP sits on top of an expendable rocket such as
the Delta IV or the Atlas V. It also has crew ejection seats, is much
lighter than the shuttles, and designed for only one purpose, crew

Although it’s not in the present budget, I think it also makes sense to
build Apollo-like capsules to serve as rescue and resupply vehicles for
Space Station. They’re relatively cheap to construct and would also fly
aboard expendable rockets. An OSP plus rescue/supply capsules would give
tremendous flexibility. This doesn’t mean that the shuttles should
immediately go away, but it does make sense to go forward with machines
allow us to do all that the shuttle does without being completely grounded
when there’s a mishap.

This will also give us a very nice side benefit, the support of the
commercial launch industry which has to compete with heavily-subsidized
European, Russian, and Chinese rockets. The assembly lines at Boeing and
Lockheed-Martin would hum if we used their launchers to send up the OSP
rescue/supply space capsules. A vigorous American aerospace industry
means a
better overall economy so there’s value all around.

My dad mined coal because the country needed coal. He used to say, “If
fails, steel fails. And if steel fails, the country fails.” Coal and steel
were more than symbols of our power and might as a nation. They were the
elements of our industrial success, the basic raw material of the “arsenal
of democracy,” as President Franklin Roosevelt liked to call us. Human
spaceflight is the modern equivalent. It is the shining symbol of our
national technological capability, but it also has a more practical side.
Unlike robots, humans carry with them a persistent curiosity and return
subjective impressions as well as objective data. The combined information
from astronauts and robotic spacecraft feed into the collective
technological, informational, and industrial data base of our nation.

The result has been stunning technological achievements not only in
aerospace, but also in medical technology, communications, energy, and
diverse fields that sustain our civilization. We delete human spaceflight
the risk of stifling a major factor in technological innovation. It’s a
subtle concept, but that doesn’t mean it’s not important. If human
spaceflight fails, technology fails. And if technology fails, the country

When Columbia first flew, it didn’t take long before her image became part
of the national consciousness. Go into any school today and you will most
likely find her shape somewhere, on a bulletin board, or in a science
classroom, or simply glued to a backpack. She is our metaphor for
excellence. In 1986, when the Challenger went down, I was in Japan,
the first Japanese astronauts. Everything was put on hold and I came home.
Thirty-two tough months followed but we swore we’d never have another
accident, not if hard work and sweat meant anything. I went back to Japan
and finished my job while the shuttles flew perfectly, one after another.
For over 14 years, we in the NASA family believed we had kept our promise.
Perhaps one thing we’ve learned from Saturday’s disaster is something we
always knew in our hearts. The only way to be completely safe is not to
at all. That, of course, is unacceptable.

But now seven wonderful men and women have been lost, along with our sweet
Columbia. Sadly, she’ll never have her place of honor in the Smithsonian
alongside the Wright Flyer or the Apollo 11 mooncraft. Fortunately, her
three sisters remain. They’re true national assets. Unless there’s some
unlikely fundamental flaw in their design, I think we should get them back
to work, doing what they’re designed to do, even with some risk. The
astronauts, all volunteers, are willing. I’d go with them if I could.

But let’s also state forthrightly if a part of the spaceflight program
to be improved. After all, to paraphrase my dad, how can we get good if we
don’t know where we’ve been bad? Then we should follow another of his
guidelines. Let’s not blame somebody else for our problems. Let’s fix
wrong and get on with business.

I think that’s exactly what Sean O’Keefe has in mind.

Mr. Hickam, a retired NASA engineer, is the author of “Sky of Stone”
(Delacorte Press, 2001) and the forthcoming “The Keeper’s Son,” to be
published this fall by St. Martin’s Press.

Note: this article first appeared in the Wall Street Journal and is reprinted here with the author’s permission.

SpaceRef staff editor.