Press Release

NASA: Federal Acquisition Regulation; Signing and Retention of High- Technology Workers; Proposed Rul

By SpaceRef Editor
December 28, 2000
Filed under ,


[Federal Register: December 28, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 250)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 82875-82876]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28de00-46]

[[Page 82875]]

———————————————————————–

Part V

Department of Defense

General Services Administration

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

———————————————————————–

48 CFR Part 31

Federal Acquisition Regulation; Signing and Retention of High-
Technology Workers; Proposed Rule

[[Page 82876]]

———————————————————————–

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Part 31

[FAR Case 2000-014]
RIN 9000-AJ00

Federal Acquisition Regulation; Signing and Retention of High-
Technology Workers

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

———————————————————————–

SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense
Acquisition Regulations Council (Councils) are proposing to amend the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to explicitly make allowable
signing and retention bonuses that defense contractors often must offer
in order to recruit and retain workers that have critical technical
skills.

DATES: Interested parties should submit comments in writing on or
before February 26, 2001 to be considered in the formulation of a final
rule. As this rule is intended only to clarify existing regulation, the
Councils are specifically interested in comments as to whether this
rule has Federal cost implications which have not been identified.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to: General Services Administration,
FAR Secretariat (MVRS), 1800 F Street, NW, Room 4035, ATTN: Laurie
Duarte, Washington, DC 20405.
Submit electronic comments via the Internet to: farcase.2000-
[email protected]

At this stage of the rulemaking process, we do not believe this is
a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804. However, the Councils seek comment on
whether there are Federal cost implications which have not been
identified.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The FAR Secretariat, Room 4035, GS
Building, Washington, DC, 20405, at (202) 501-4755 for information
pertaining to status or publication schedules. For clarification of
content, contact Mr. Jeremy Olson, Procurement Analyst, at (202) 501-
0692. Please cite FAR case 2000-014.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

The Government increasingly is contracting for technical services.
This is driven by the need to maximize the use of technology to improve
the efficiency and effectiveness of Government performance. Due to the
tight labor market, companies doing business with the Government often
must provide recruitment and retention bonuses to compete with
predominantly non-Government firms to attract personnel with critical
technical skills. This practice is analogous to the practice in the
public sector of permitting signing bonuses for difficult-to-fill
positions and retention allowances for essential Government employees.
The proposed rule revises FAR 31.205-34, Recruitment costs, to
explicitly allow signing bonuses to recruit, as well as retention
bonuses to retain, employees with critical skills (such as scientists
and engineers in the software and systems integration fields). The
Councils view this revision as a clarification since the FAR currently
does not disallow these type of expenses. In addition, the rule moves
the current limitations on help-wanted advertising costs from FAR
31.205-34(b) to the paragraph that addresses these costs (currently FAR
31.205-34(a)(1)), and makes several related editorial changes.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under Section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is
not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Councils do not expect this proposed rule to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because most contracts awarded to small entities use simplified
acquisition procedures or are awarded on a competitive, fixed-price
basis, and do not require application of the cost principle contained
in this rule. An Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has,
therefore, not been performed. We invite comments from small businesses
and other interested parties. The Councils will consider comments from
small entities concerning the affected FAR Part in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments separately and
should cite 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. (FAR case 2000-014), in
correspondence.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act

The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the proposed
changes to the FAR do not impose information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 31

Government procurement.

Dated: December 21, 2000.
Al Matera,
Acting Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA propose that 48 CFR part 31 be
amended as set forth below:

PART 31–CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 31 continues to read as
follows:

Authority: 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42
U.S.C. 2473(c).

2. Revise section 31.205-34 to read as follows:

31.205-34 Recruitment and retention costs.

The following costs are allowable:
(a) Costs of help-wanted advertising. However, these costs are
unallowable if the advertising–
(1) Does not describe specific positions or classes of positions;
or
(2) Includes material that is not relevant for recruitment
purposes, such as extensive illustrations or descriptions of the
company’s products or capabilities.
(b) Costs of operating an employment office needed to secure and
maintain an adequate labor force.
(c) Costs of operating an aptitude and educational testing program.
(d) Travel costs of employees engaged in recruiting personnel.
(e) Travel costs of applicants for interviews.
(f) Costs for employment agencies, not in excess of standard
commercial rates.
(g) Signing bonuses needed to recruit employees with critical
skills (such as scientists and engineers in fields like software and
systems integration), if comparable to the signing bonuses being
offered by firms engaged in predominantly non-Government work to
attract similar job skills.
(h) Periodic retention bonuses needed to retain employees with
critical skills (such as scientists and engineers in fields like
software and systems integration), if comparable to the periodic
retention bonuses being paid by firms engaged in predominantly non-
Government work to retain similar job skills.

[FR Doc. 0033047 Filed 12-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-U

SpaceRef staff editor.