AIP FYI #113: Mikulski on Doubling NSF: “The Appropriators Cannot Do It Alone”

When the House and Senate return next week the most important
tasks facing them will be passing the final versions of
thirteen appropriations bills. One bill that will be closely
followed is the FY 2002 VA, HUD, and Independent Agencies
Appropriations Bill, which provides funding for the National
Science Foundation and NASA. Both the House and Senate have
passed their own versions of this legislation. James Walsh
(R-NY) and Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), chairs of the VA, HUD
appropriations subcommittees, and their colleagues, will be
writing the final version of this legislation, which will then
be sent to the House and Senate for a final up-or-down vote.

The House bill would increase the NSF budget by 9.4%, while
the Senate bill provides a 5.6% increase. Approximately 15%
is required to double a budget in five years.

During Senate consideration of this legislation, Mikulski
shared her views on funding priorities within this bill. She
stated, “I remain fully committed to the doubling of the
budget for NSF over the next five years, but without the
support of the administration, the authorizing committees, and
the Budget Committees, the appropriators cannot do it alone.”
A portion of her remarks follow:

“My guiding principles in drafting this bill were simple: keep
the promises to our veterans; meet the compelling day-to-day
needs of working poor; re-build our neighborhoods and
communities; and, invest in science and technology to create
jobs today and jobs tomorrow.

“Based on the President’s budget proposal and our
subcommittee’s allocation, we had to focus on restoring cuts
in the President’s budget and avoiding riders.

“Our overriding goal was to make sure that the core programs
in veterans and housing were taken care of first, and we did
that.

“We could not increase spending for any programs until our
core programs for veterans and the poor were taken care of.

“While I wish the subcommittee had more resources for science,
we did the best we could do given our allocation.

“I remain fully committed to doubling the budget for NSF over
the next five years, but without the support of the
administration, the authorizing committees, and the Budget
Committees, the appropriators cannot do it alone.”

“For the National Science Foundation, we provide a total of
$4.7 billion for research and education. This is an increase
of $256 million or 6 percent over last year.

“We had hoped to provide more. Senator Bond and I – and a
large number of our Senate colleagues – believe it is in the
national interest to double the NSF budget over the next 5
years.

“This recommendation represents a down payment on that policy
objective.”

“I would like to have been able to do more for science,
technology and housing production, but this is the best we can
do under our allocation and satisfy the priorities of our
Members.

“To reiterate, this committee reported the bill and it
compromises $84 billion in discretionary budget authority and
$88 billion in outlays. The bill is balanced and fair and
meets the needs of the American people. Our job was to meet
certain compelling issues.

“My guiding principles were, No. 1, to keep our promises to
the veterans for them to have the health care they need and
not stand in line when they have to apply for their pensions;
to work in the area of housing and urban development, that we
would develop the programs and policies that would empower the
poor to be able to move to a better life as well as rebuilding
our neighborhoods and our community; also to stand up and
protect the environment and invest in science and technology
to create jobs today and jobs tomorrow.

“Based on the President’s budget proposal and the subcommittee
allocation, we had to focus on restoring cuts in the
President’s budget and, of course, we worked very hard to
avoid riders. Our overriding goal was to make sure that core
programs in veterans and housing and the environment were
taken care of. We did that. We could not increase the funding
for every program that was meritorious, but we could meet the
basic needs of our responsibilities.

“One of the areas that we were sorry we could not increase
funding to the level we wanted was in doubling the budget for
the National Science Foundation over the next five years.”

###############

Richard M .Jones

Public Information Division

The American Institute of Physics

fyi@aip.org

(301) 209-3095

http://www.aip.org/gov

##END##########