AIP FYI #128: Congress Passes Bill Authorizing Doubling of NSF Budget
As Congress moved toward the conclusion of this session, it appeared
increasingly less likely that time would be found to settle on, and then
pass, compromise legislation authorizing a doubling of the National Science
Foundation’s budget. Objections from the Bush Administration had
unexpectedly sidetracked the legislation, and time was running out for the
bill. Long hours by the staff of the House and Senate authorizing
committees led to a compromise bill that both chambers passed late last week
and which President Bush will sign. Under this bill, H.R. 4664, the
authorization level for the National Science Foundation will be on track to
double by the year 2007.
The drive to double federal science and technology funding dates to the
introduction of a bill by Senator Phil Gramm (R-TX) in early 1997. Similar
bills, pushed by Senator Bill Frist (R-TN) and several other senators, went
through a number of evolutions and were passed by the Senate. Although
House legislation was introduced, no such broadly written bill ever moved in
this chamber. That changed for NSF when Rep. Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY)
became the chairman of the House Science Committee.
The outlook for the NSF improved in the summer of 2000 when Senator
Christopher “Kit” Bond (R-MO) and Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) wrote a
letter to the Senate leadership advocating a doubling of the foundation’s
budget in five years. Designed to demonstrate political support for NSF,
this and another letter attracted more than 40 signatures. They continued
to hammer away at this goal, although often the funding they provided
through the VA/HUD appropriations bill could not meet their stated
objectives. In 2001, Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-TX) introduced
legislation in the House to authorize a doubling of NSF’s budget.
Movement to double NSF’s budget became much stronger this year. In early
June, the House voted 397 to 25 for a bill sponsored by Rep. Nick Smith
(R-MI) to authorize an eventual doubling of the foundation’s budget. This
bill, calling for a 15% increase for NSF in FY 2003, contrasted with the
Bush Administration’s request of what amounted to a 3% increase. In August,
Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) introduced similar legislation for a doubling of
the budget in five years. The bill was sent to the Senate floor following
ten minutes of discussion during a busy hearing in September. Questions and
a cited administration letter at this hearing revealed the administration’s
problems with a five-year authorization and with the FY 2003 funding level.
The hopeful word among the science community in Washington was, however,
that discrepancies between the House and Senate versions of the bill had
been resolved, and that following a quick Senate vote on a compromise bill
it would be sent back over to the House for a final vote. This did not
occur when the administration had a hold put on the legislation.
Time was running out for this bill as Congress was moving rapidly toward
adjournment. So it was somewhat unexpected when the Bush Administration and
the authorizing committees reached an agreement on compromise language. As
will be outlined in forthcoming FYIs, the legislation authorizes a doubling
of the NSF budget by FY 2007. The final two years are contingent on a
demonstration of effective NSF management. The word “doubling” was removed
from the bill’s title. In describing H.R. 4664 that chairman Boehlert so
successfully moved through his committee, and then the House, he said, “We
turn to NSF to solve some of our most pressing problems; we can’t turn from
NSF when we decide where to invest federal funds. It’s time to give the NSF
the money it needs.”
President Bush will sign H.R. 4664 in the next few days. His signature on
this bill will be a very significant milestone for the National Science
Foundation, and should have ramifications on other science and technology
budgets. The solid support for NSF that will be shown by the President’s
signature, and the action taken by the House and Senate, will place the
foundation in a strong position as the FY 2003 appropriation is finalized,
and as the FY 2004 budget cycle begins.
In closing, a statement once made by Senator Mikulski, which no doubt
reflects the sentiments of Senator Bond and their House counterparts, is
worth repeating:
“I remain fully committed to the doubling of the budget for NSF over the
next five years, but without the support of the administration, the
authorizing committees, and the Budget Committees, the appropriators cannot
do it alone.”
H.R. 4664 provides that support.
Richard M. Jones
Media and Government Relations Division
The American Institute of Physics
fyi@aip.org
(301) 209-3095
Please visit the AIP Science Policy site at http://www.aip.org/gov for
previous issues of FYI, other science policy information, and subscriber
options.
