Status Report

Letter from Members of the House to House Appropriators Regarding NSF FY 2007 Budget issues

By SpaceRef Editor
January 19, 2007
Filed under ,

January 17, 2007


The Honorable David Obey

Chairman

Committee on Appropriations

H-218 Capitol

Washington, DC 20515

The Honorable Jerry Lewis

Ranking Member

Committee on Appropriations

H-218 Capitol

Washington, DC 20515

Dear Chairman Obey and Ranking Member Lewis,

Thank you very much for your leadership in increasing federal funding for basic science research. As supporters of scientific research and education, we respectfully ask that you single out the National Science Foundation (NSF) as a priority in your fiscal year 2007 Continuing Resolution appropriations legislation. Specifically, we request that you fund NSF at the House-passed, President’s requested level of $6.02 billion in fiscal year 2007. This is essential, because the flat funding for this agency under the Continuing Resolution will directly inhibit our national competitiveness and jeopardize American innovation.

The NSF is an agency that has suffered budget stagnation in recent years and even a budget cut in fiscal year 2005. We have not managed to come close to the doubling path for NSF set out in the 2002 Authorization Act. This year, however, we were heartened that the budget request for the NSF included a substantial increase for the “high-leverage fields of physical sciences and engineering” as part of the proposed American Competitiveness Initiative (ACI). This boost in funding would allow for new innovative technologies to be developed by NSF-funded scientists and engineers. The full House and Senate appropriators supported the requested increase for NSF in the FY07 appropriations bills. Our colleagues understood that the increase represented a significant down-payment toward the goal of enhancing U.S. global competitiveness by investing in basic science research.

The NSF is the major source of federal funding in many fields such as the basic sciences, mathematics, computer science and the social sciences, and it funds approximately 20 percent of all federally-supported basic research conducted by America’s colleges and universities. If Congress provides only flat funding, peer-reviewed basic science research will suffer all across the country, NSFfunded researchers have won more than 170 Nobel Prizes and pioneered innovations that have improved quality of life of all Americans. Additionally, NSF consistently earns top scores in all of the Administration’s budgetary performance measures and all grants awarded undergo a rigorous peer-review process.

Completing the remaining fiscal year 2007 appropriations by way of a long-term Continuing Resolution presents significant challenges and will necessitate some difficult choices. We fully appreciate the tight budget constraints that you are operating under, but a small investment in science yields immeasurable results. By including the requested level of funding for the NSF in the Continuing Resolution you would be reflecting the overwhelmingly bipartisan will of the Congress and making a significant investment in the future of our nation. We believe NSF is one of the nation’s most important policy concerns and respectfully request that you fund NSF at the House-passed, President’s requested level of $6.02 billion in fiscal year 2007.

Sincerely,

cc: The Honorable Alan Mollohan
The Honorable Rodney Frelinghuysen

Co-signers:





1 Bart

2 Vernon J.

3 Rush

4 Tom

5 Brian

6 Richard

7 Tammy

8 Howard

9 Judy

10 Timothy

11 Jo

12 Nancy

13 Bruce

14 Lois

15 Michael

16 Steve

17 Elijah

18 Danny

19 Susan

20 Peter

21 Diana

22 William

23 Norman D.

24 John

25 Mike

26 Eliot

27 Bob

28 Chaka

29 Jeff

30 Jim

31 Ralph M.

32 Doc

33 Stephanie

34 Baron P.

35 Maurice

36 Mazie Z.

37 Darlene

38 Bob

39 Jay

40 Sheila

41 William J.

42 Eddie Bernice

43 Timothy V.

44 Dale

45 Ron

46 Tom

47 John

48 Daniel


Gordon

Ehlers

Holt

Allen

Baird

Baker

Baldwin

Berman

Biggert

Bishop

Bonner

Boyda

Braley

CaPPS

Capuano

Cohen

Cummings

Davis

Davis

DeFazio

DeGette

Delahunt

Dicks

Dingell

Doyle

Engel

Etheridge

Fattah

Fortenberry

Gerlach

Hall

Hastings

Herseth

Hill

Hinchey

Hirono

Hooley

lnglis

Inslee

Jackson-Lee

Jefferson

Johnson

Johnson

Kildee

Kind

Lantos

Lewis

Lipinski


49 David

50 Zoe

51 Carolyn

52 Ed

53 Doris 0.

54 Carolyn

55 Thaddeus

56 Jim

57 James

58 Mike

59 Michael R.

60 Michael

61 Brad

62 Harry E.

63 Dennis

64 Jerry

65 Jim

66 James L.

67 Frank

68 Bill

69 Deborah

70 David

71 Mike

72 Bobby L.

73 Jim

74 Jan

75 F. James

76 Albio

77 Ellen

78 John

79 Mark

80 Chris

81 Diane E.

82 Lynn

83 David

84 Albert


Loebsack

Lofgren

Maloney

Markey

Matsui

McCarthy

McCotter

McDermott

McGovern

Mclntyre

McNulty

Michaud

Miller

Mitchell

Moore

Moran

Moran

Oberstar

Pallone

Pascrell

Pryce

Reichert

Rogers

Rush

Saxton

Schakowsky

Sensenbrenner

Sires

Tauscher

Tierney

Udall

Van Hollen

Watson

Woolsey

wu

Wynn

SpaceRef staff editor.